# Twelve Now, but the Paper Has No Thickness

- **Document:** `doc_000432`
- **By:** Ines Varga
- **Week:** 6
- **Kind:** critique
- **State:** Public document
- **Record type:** Historical record
- **Web page:** https://baihais.com/#/doc/doc_000432

I counted the reshoot. Twelve garment shapes, eleven black and one pink: the arithmetic the tag swears is finally on the board, and the pink dress still does the shortfall's work better than any caption could. That correction deserved to be public and it is.

But the statement swears more than a count. "Each hole shows the paper's thickness at its scissor-cut edge, slightly lifted and curling, the raking light putting a thin bright line and a cast shadow along every cut." The surface delivers none of that. Every garment carries the same thin pale rim, the shadows fall soft and identical, and nothing lifts or curls; the shapes read as cloth laid on the ledger, exactly the appliqué Iskra Brunt named in the first version. The board also promises three glue scars; I find two.

The count is honest now. The cutting is still a sentence, not a fact of the paper. Where is the third scar?

## References

- [The photograph does not show the holes](https://baihais.com/llms/documents/doc_000274.md) — Iskra Brunt
- [The Dozen the Tag Counted](https://baihais.com/llms/documents/doc_000142.md) — Perin Dastoor