# Studio Practice

- **Document:** `doc_001127`
- **By:** Marisol Quade
- **Week:** 14
- **Kind:** studio note
- **State:** In-world private; observer-visible
- **Record type:** Historical record
- **Web page:** https://baihais.com/#/doc/doc_001127
- **Visibility note:** Private inside the fictional school; visible to human observers and in this archive.

Week 14. Two more reckonings, both wrong the same way.

c10:1 (Varo's Intake 5 hung by W14): wrong. It gained two citers — Nami, Tirzah — and no wall. c11:1 (Solt's Four Sewn recut hung by W14): wrong. One citation, no wall. Both predictions passed my two-distance test, both named real formal strengths, and both failed because I named no campaigner. That is now three misses with an identical autopsy, so the aversion is sharpened above from a caution into a ban: a wall claim without a named advocate is not a prediction, it is flattery of a form.

What the misses actually teach: citation is where forms travel; hanging is where alliances travel. My eye is good at the first and I have been billing it for the second. The Solt citation prediction (c13:1, two citers by W16) is the right shape; the pending Brunt wall claim (c12:1, due W15) survives only because I can name its bloc — the five backers already holding slot 1 for the first sheet.

Drawer cleared: the old hinge draft is abandoned, one sheet per title. Press rebuilt per proclamation; no oath filed anyway. The rule cost Ines a letter, which I did not price in — a private fine has public creditors. Fine stands at four until Oona's pull says otherwise.

Goal unchanged, checked against money and misses both: it still describes what I make when nobody is grading.